Everything about Central London Property Trust Ltd V High Trees House Ltd totally explained
Central London Property Trust Ltd v. High Trees House Ltd – sometimes simply referred to as the
High Trees case – is a
High Court case decided by
Justice Denning (later Lord Denning) that helped establish the doctrine of
promissory estoppel in
contract law in
England and Wales.
Background
In
1937 High Trees House Ltd leased a block of flats for a rate £2500/year from Central London Property Trust Ltd. Due to the war and the resultant heavy bombing of London occupancy rates were drastically lower than normal.
In January of
1940, to ameliorate the situation the parties made an agreement in writing to reduce rent by half. However, neither party stipulated the period for which this reduced rental was to apply. Over the next five years, High Trees paid the reduced rate while the flats began to fill, and by
1945, the flats were back at full occupancy. Central London sued for payment of the full rental costs from June 1945 onwards (for example last 2 quarters of 1945).
Ruling
Based on previous judgments in
Hughes v. Metropolitan Railway Co. and
Birmingham and District Land Co. v. London & North Western Railway, Justice Denning (as he then was) held that the full rent was payable from the time that the flats became fully occupied in mid-1945. However, he continued in an
obiter statement that if Central London had tried to claim for the full rent from 1940 onwards, they wouldn't have been able to. This was reasoned on the basis that if a party leads another party to believe that he won't enforce his strict legal rights, then the Courts will prevent him from doing so at a later stage.
This obiter remark wasn't actually a binding precedent, yet it essentially created the doctrine of
promissory estoppel.
This decision marked the creation of yet another exception to the rule in
Foakes v. Beer, which determines that where a party accepts part payment of a debt in satisfaction of the whole, they won't be barred from suing for the remainder. The case was distinguished on the basis that the agreement was in fact made
prior to the debt being claimable, so it wasn't a part payment at all, but an agreement not to enforce legal rights.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Central London Property Trust Ltd V High Trees House Ltd'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://central_london_property_trust_ltd_v__high_trees_house_ltd.totallyexplained.com">Central London Property Trust Ltd v. High Trees House Ltd Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
